Citizen    Government    Business    Visitor
Wyoming Water Development Commission 
Harry C. LaBonde, Jr., PE, Director 
6920 Yellowtail Rd, Cheyenne, WY 82002 
Phone: 307-777-7626 

Agency Information
 Mission Statement
 Directory
 Calendar
 Commission Agendas & Minutes
 Consultant Selection
 Items Open for Public Comment
 Newsletter
 Operating Criteria
 Project Application Information
 Send Us Your Comments

Planning Program
 Dam and Reservoir Planning
 Groundwater Grant Projects
 Instream Flow Filings
 Current Planning Projects
 River Basin Planning
 Weather Modification Study
 Probable Maximum Precipitation
 Water Research Projects

Construction Program
 Current Construction Projects
 Small Water Projects

Agency Publications
 Project Reports
 Water/Climate Web Atlas
 Irrigation & Water System Surveys
 Legislative Reports
 Water Mgmnt & Conservation Dir
 History of Wyoming Water Law

WWDC Home Page

Water Plan Home Page

WRDS Home Page

1999 LEGISLATIVE REPORT
Active Projects

 84. PROJECT:Rafter J Water Supply
LEVEL:II
SPONSOR:Rafter J Homeowner's Association
LOCATION:Teton County
PROGRAM:New Development
  
EXISTING LEGISLATION:
Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date
Level II 46 1997 II $60,000 1999

PROJECT INFORMATION:
The Rafter J subdivision is located in southwestern Teton County, approximately 2 miles south of Jackson. Its water supply consists of two 450 gpm wells and a 200,000 gallon storage tank. The daily use per capita is approximately 300 gallons on a peak day and 190 gallons on an average day. The system is un-metered.

The Level II study evaluated drilling a third well, and evaluated the storage, transmission and distribution components of the system. Originally this project did not meet WWDC criteria. The system had the following problems:

  1. The well field, storage tank lot and common lands were owned by the developer.

  2. The developer held ownership to speculative development lots both residential and commercial involved in the 'district'.

  3. The developer and lands involved in the 'district' were involved in a litigation case.

  4. The applicant was not a district with taxation authority.

To meet WWDC criteria the Homeowners Association agreed to form a district and see that the developer was out of the district as a developer and only present as a developed lot owner. The district was formed only after extending the project for an additional year due to no response to the district vote. The developer did provide water system access to the Homeowners Association but retained ownership of undeveloped land in the district. Due to the presence of the developer in the district, the proposed Level III project was rejected by the Select Water Committee.

RECOMMENDED LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
No legislative action is required.

   Citizen    Government    Business    Visitor   Privacy Policy